This means the amount of times a jockey can use their whip has been reduced to 7 times in Flat and 8 in Jump races; with a maximum of 5 strokes in the last furlong of final obstacle.

There has been quite a lot of support for this change. Everyone from Animal Rights Groups to jockeys like Dettori and AP McCoy have supported the move. However, I wonder whether this is only because it is deemed to be the ‘politically correct’ thing to do.

If indeed, it is the right thing to do, why stop there? Surely, the point being made is that animals should be treated better, and if we are to follow that train of thought - then there is a strong argument to stop the racing of horses completely.

If, on the other hand, we accept the fact that horse racing is here to stay; and that the main purpose of racing is to facilitate the betting industry, then why change the rules?

I would have to agree with Richard Hughes, who believes the whip is essential in getting the best out of the horse. Personally, if I stake my money on a horse, I demand that the trainer and jockey do their utmost to get the most out of the animal. Bottom line is, if I lost my bet because the jockey didn’t use the whip - I would be inclined not to bet on that sport again.

With this in mind, if other punters think the same - then inevitably there will be no life in racing - and therefore no need for the horses....